  |


View
more  |
 |
 |
 |
Proposal for a Public art intervention in
Peralta, Navarra, for Proyecto Calle, first Call of Public Art
of Peralta
(Peralta Council, Government of Navarra, Department of Culture and
Education) by Consol Rodríguez and Gregg Smith
As a visitor
to Peralta, one is immediately aware of the intimate scale of the
town. It is not a place where one can easily find anonymity. We quickly
realised that almost everybody knows everybody there and community
life is quite strong. In a town the size of Peralta one can imagine
that the smallness of the population has both advantages and disadvantages.
In such a place it must be hard to keep secrets. With our project
we wanted to place values on the intimate relationships and communications
which exist within the everyday life of Peralta.
 |
 |
 |
 |
Synopsis
Our proposal for Proyecto Calle originated in an interest
to revitalise the public / urban space and transform it into a place
that is susceptible of embracing a multiple history. A history equipped
with all kinds of memories that generate a fragmentary and contradictory
whole upon which it has to be build, with all its difficulties, the
consciousness of the present time.
Our project was born from a punctual and experimental intervention
that aims at interfering, redefining and modifying the places that
are already regulated by the already existing architectonic reality.
The artistic function doesn’t have to be, it shouldn’t be, reduced
to a simple function of embellishment of the public space in determined points
of the physical, political and social order that is already dictated by the urbanism
function –such things are usually found in the conventional monumental
sculpture-.
Our proposal is a practice, and not something that has been already given. It
is a way of exercising the right to speak one’s voice and to invite others
to do the same. A way of understanding art as something critical and active that
has a commitment with an art conception as something socially useful, as an enema
to recover the public space as a social place where the collectivity is allowed
to develop a critic culture with which to respond the established discourse and
decide the profile of its memory, to enjoy the aesthetic experience and to vehiculate
the expression to the community itself. It is born from the will to really re-appropriate
the public sphere till discover in it a diverse history with different legacies
and multiple subjectivity's.
The public space is something that is produced, it is not something pre-existent,
and usually the dominant institutions are the ones which determine it. Public
art appears as the instrument to reconsider this imposed public order to produce
a new one. Then, the function of public art is that of doing or undoing the public
space. This radical construction of the public sphere can be only accomplished
if one takes into account and respects the following requisites: that it will
be public the shape, the meaning and the effect of these new spaces or interventions.
The beginning of our proposal departed from a temporary action that would lead
to the installation of a commemorative work of an event by signalising indefinite
places and acting over marginal territories. This is a way to contribute to truly
socialise the public space or to participate in the intertwining of what is public
and what is private.
This point of departure of the temporary action would have been the result of
a consciousness of two ideas:
1. The acceptance of the public space as a platform for changing
events and expressions
2. The precariousness of the notion of place, a
category that just admits one present
The punctual intervention would have aimed at emphasising the possibility of
re-activating the public space by means of a real and practical use of it. In
addition to this, by putting this accent on the intention, it would have aimed
to question the impulse to improve the public/urban context through strictly
object-based or aesthetic means.
The proposal for this project operated in two stages.
 |
 |
 |
 |
Stage one
In the first stage we would invite local residents to engage in the
following way. Couples (groups of not more than two) would be approached
of people in the town who have very close relationships with one
another. They would be requested to take part in The Messenger,
by agreeing, for the period of five days, to abstain from the use
of any telephonic or electronic means when communicating with each
other. If it were not possible to communicate via the spoken word,
messages would be sent through hand-delivered notes. It would be
important that no telephonic or electronic means of communication
were used except in case of complete emergency.
The couples of people could be friends, lovers, family or they even
need not know each other. But their objective is to arrange to meet
somewhere in the town during that period. They could meet as often
as they liked but all arrangements would have to be made via hand-written
messages. The messages could be left at a secret hiding place or
sent via a family member or a friend. After the period was over we
would ask that we might use some of these for the next stage of the
project.
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
 |
Stage
two
This stage would make use of the messages that had been collected
from Stage One. The messages would be used for two purposes:
1.The creation of a series of postcards
The nature of a postcard is usually that it acts as a souvenir of
a place, a short note to someone who you are thinking of while travelling.
It can be a pretty view or something funny and amusing or something
historic or iconic.
For The messenger some postcards would be produced with a text already
written on it. An intimate, hand-written text which offered an insight
into the mundane realities f the lie there. The postcard will also
contain an image which relates to the communication between the two
people. The user of the postcard would be able to write their own
message over this image. In this way the project would place values
on sights in the town which are significant for personal reasons
2. A series of large texts on walls in various public
spaces around Peralta
As permanent public intervention some of the meeting places would
be demarcated by enlarging a selection of the texts and adding them
to the environment of the place. The text would be enlarged directly
from the original hand-written message. |
 |
|
|